In the previous instalment on the Syndrome of the Great Prelate, having noted the precarious emotional state of Father Alessandro Minutella, I had proposed – free of charge – a psychoanalytic analysis conducted by the renowned Sigmund Freud. However, in the broadcast of 31 July, the Lion of Mary rejected the unflattering diagnosis, declaring himself to be in excellent mental health and relegating me to the crowded category he had created of «raving enemies», lately also termed «howling enemies».

Even Minutella’s editorial director of Adoración y Liberación, Vicente Montesinos, attempted to defend himself against Freud, but his reaction appeared rather awkward, and his arguments uncertain. Within a few hours, the director removed the brief, resigned video and replaced it with another, considerably more irate, lasting over an hour, yet retaining the same title. Montesinos expressed astonishment at Marco Tosatti’s temerity in publishing such an article, accused Freud of offending the mentally ill, who instead deserve respect, and furthermore deemed me guilty of manifest «dishonesty» and liable to legal action. Thus – according to the director – by describing “The Case of Dora”, Freud would have shown disrespect to the patient.

Montesinos’ reasoning is of masterful logic: it would be like accusing a skilled mechanic of showing little respect for cars because he lifts the bonnet to check the engine’s faults; moreover, at times, the same mechanic takes a poor, defenceless car, places it on the lift, examines it from below, and – horror of horrors – lays hands on it! Indeed, cases have already been recorded of mechanics accused of «abuse of lesser vehicles» (meaning those with only a few years of registration).

In the same broadcast, where I was also threatened once more, Minutella once again quoted a page from Last Conversations, in which Peter Seewald asks Benedict XVI:

«You know the prophecy of Malachy, who in the Middle Ages compiled a list of future popes, foreseeing even the end of the world, or at least the end of the Church. According to this list, the papacy would end with your pontificate. And if you were indeed the last to represent the figure of the pope as we have known him until now?». Benedict replies: Anything is possible.

In the book on Bergoglio, published immediately after his death (A Freemason on the Chair of Peter, pp. 447-449), I have already explained the meaning of this historic expression by Ratzinger, yet I was categorically contradicted by the Lion of Mary, who claimed that this Anything is possible means: God has revealed to me that there is Father Minutella and the little remnant… That Father Minutella… may be the continuation, as is underscored by my very predecessor.

Let us pause for reflection and attempt to clarify: Benedict XVI, without knowing Minutella, prophesied his divine investiture and announced it to the world in 2016. Had Sigmund Freud’s ashes not been preserved in the Golders Green crematorium, he would have turned in his grave. Immediately afterwards, Minutella complained about the Little Remnant, for these attacks by Satan (he was still railing against the unfortunate Freud) were due to the delay in recognising him as the successor of the last Pope elected by a regular conclave. After receiving phone calls from the little remnants cheering him on, the Lion of Mary concluded the broadcast with these words: I bless you as Successor.

In the homily of 2 August, the Lion continued to reproach the priests of the sodality for hesitating to recognise him as the holder of the potestas ordinis: «The Lord is watching over us… I would not wish the Lord to pass us by should He see that we are afraid; and certainly, I know that I must do everything myself, but because of those who are afraid, it becomes a Caesarean birth, with the risk of a natural miscarriage. I pray that, because of your fear, the birth does not become a spontaneous miscarriage… I have been left alone, I am in extreme solitude, and even heaven, for now, remains silent… and may heaven make you understand that the decisive turning point has arrived… courage is needed, which, unfortunately, has not yet arrived».

That same evening, the tone had softened somewhat, and he justified the delays of the priests of the sodality: «It means that the time is not yet right, it means they do not feel up to it, it means that… we must proceed calmly…». Following a now well-established technique, by abruptly changing his attitude, the Lion roared: «It is the people who are calling, it is the people who are asking… this is a pressing demand from the Eternal Father, let us hope it is understood, let us hope… if we go too far, it is finished, is it the voice of God or not, and we cannot go beyond it. The brethren still do not understand, I do not feel understood».

Minutella could no longer bear it, and at all costs wished to be proclaimed Successor, despite possessing a munus «homemade». The heightened emotional disturbance of Father Alessandro elicited not only laughter, but also compassion, for his declarations were now entirely beyond control.

We do not know whether it was due to locutions, visions, or mystical raptures, but the fact remains that, among the various promotional spots created to have himself elected successor to Benedict XVI, Father Alessandro brought onto the scene nothing less than the voice of God: «The Lord says: “I give proof of it on all sides. No man could endure ten years like that one. If he endures thus, and is full of enthusiasm, joy, strength, and vitality, it is because I am with him… It is I who give the sign that he is the elect”». In the same broadcast of 3 August, not only on account of Freud’s diagnosis, but also due to another previous article, Minutella described Marco Tosatti as «a person unworthy of being a journalist».

The «father of joy», as his fans call him, after three sleepless nights due to Freud’s psychoanalysis, on 5 August launched another attack against Antonio Romano: «He is the most wicked of all, a dishonest and cowardly wretch beyond compare… this cowardly wretch». Particularly noteworthy is the analysis by the nun psychologist consulted by Benedict XVI’s successor, who misquotes the title of the article, claims it was not published on a scientific community website but on a blog that defines itself as Catholic (which is incorrect), asserts that there is no such thing as the «Syndrome of the Great Prelate» in psychology manuals, describing it simply as an invention by the author of the article; she mentions a video that does not exist and attributes to Romano the expression «explosive cocktail», whereas in fact it was used by the former Great Prelate; she further assures that her protégé has never taken performance-enhancing substances, and for this reason Romano is a liar to be reported to the competent authorities.

I can justify the enthusiasm and devotion of the young nun towards the Successor, yet the question remains: has she read the article?! Apart from the confusion, it is worthy of scientific attention – to be reported to the Order of Psychologists – when the nun claims that Freud refers to Homo sapiens belonging to a distant past, when society was still «patriarchal» and – in her words – «carriages still existed», thus we are speaking of mammals belonging to a hominid species no longer classifiable by current psychoanalytic criteria. From this we might deduce that Jesus was a primitive, whose anthropological assessments are inadequate for modern man; and what of Noah, who did not even have a carriage, because he only had the ark? To avoid being fossilised in the age of carriages, I would advise the nun to read “The Seminar, Book I, Freud’s Technical Writings” by Jacques Lacan, and Psychoanalysis of the Gospel by Françoise Dolto. Immediately after the psychologist’s scathing criticism of the unwary Antonio Romano, Minutella threatened him again in various ways, promising to report him to the Order of Psychologists and to sue Marco Tosatti (guilty of having republished the article from QuotidianoWeb).

Needless to say, Romano is not at all at war with Father Alessandro; the following day, demonstrating that he had read nothing of this author’s work and was therefore speaking at random, Minutella continued to insult him, accusing him of being one of many una cum in the service of the system. In anticipation of the solemn recognition, the date of which – in my view – has already been set, Our Man proceeded with his usual refrain: «Paul… consecrated bishops… it is not excluded that Paul may have received consecration, but at the same time it is not written… Paul says he went to Peter and shook his hand, he does not say he placed his hand on his head».

Minutella does not like being called Pope, for it is true that he is the legitimate successor of Benedict XVI, but in another manner, just as Ratzinger had told Seewald, and it is pointless to pose impertinent questions to the «twice theologian»; it is so, and that’s ENOUGH!

The prophecy of Ratzinger, Anything is possible, is coming to pass: seminaries will fill with young men more fervent than those of Father Pagliarani of the FSSPX, the clergy will acclaim the Successor, and on Sundays, in a triumph of faith, the Christian people will gather beneath the balcony in Carini for the recitation of the Angelus. We wish the Successor a fruitful and locution-rich pontificate.

In trepid anticipation of the solemn proclamation, one final important consideration.

In his studies on hysteria, Sigmund Freud drew inspiration from the renowned physician Jean-Martin Charcot, creator of the term «neurology» and director of the psychiatric hospital laSalpêtrière in Paris. Here is some good news that may be useful to several people: although Dr Charcot has been dead for some time, the psychiatric department of laSalpêtrière is still open and fully operational.

[[IMG_1]]

Antonio Romano