Tags
#All articles
Since the resignation of Benedict XVI in 2013, a question has divided part of the Catholic Church: is the See of Peter legitimately occupied? A Latin expression, popularised from 2021 onwards, has come to crystallise this incendiary debate: the Magna Quaestio.
A Bolivian court has convicted two men of the ritual murder of a young mother, who was sacrificed to Pachamama. These revelations have reignited the controversy from 2019, when statues of this deity were brought into the Vatican during the Synod on the Amazon. This makes the outrage among Catholics all the more justified.
Pope Leo XIV is marking his country’s 250th anniversary by visiting Lampedusa, a controversial symbol of migration. He has declined an invitation to the United States, prompting comparisons to Jean Raspail’s *The Camp of the Saints*. Mass immigration is impoverishing Europe, fueling insecurity and tensions. The Vatican and the West are profiting financially from this policy, while local populations bear the brunt of its effects. A symbolic choice, but one that has drawn criticism.
In this prophetic text from 1945, Fr.Julio Meinvielle asserts that the victory of democracies does not guarantee peace. According to him, the dominant powers and global financial forces risk imposing a system of total “security” based on technical, economic, and political control of peoples. Under the guise of freedom and democracy, a form of universal servitude could thus be established.
Father Giorgio Maria Faré criticizes Bishop Schneider's position, which recognizes the current pope while rejecting certain teachings of the Magisterium. He asserts that such “selective obedience” contradicts canon law and borders on schism. According to him, if a conflict with Tradition is perceived, one must first examine the legitimacy of the pope's election.
Most “Catholics” today are willfully blind, ensnared in the comforting lies of the 'Synodal Religion'. The Synodal infestation in Rome has not only capitulated but has done so with great enthusiasm.
Can’t we consider the possibility that Francis and Leo are anti-popes? Whereas previous popes may have led grievously sinful lives, they didn’t alter Church teaching in official documents. With Francis all that changed.
Carlos Caso-Rosendi criticizes internal debates within the Church at a time when, according to the author, a decisive spiritual moment is approaching. He reminds us that the Church “subsists” in the Catholic Church without being entirely reduced to it. Like the Pharisees of old, Christians risk being right on certain points (such as the Mass) while missing the essential: recognizing Christ and discerning the signs of his return.
In the current context of the Catholic Church's crisis, 'where sin abounds, grace abounds all the more' (Rom 5:20), and we are currently witnessing a flourishing of talented authors that the Aream Suam site proposes to introduce you to.
Leo XIV has named Bishop James R. Golka, the Colorado Springs prelate who helped neutralize Peru’s Chiclayo abuse case, as Denver’s new archbishop.
A newly resurfaced 1990 prophecy reveals Malachi Martin issuing urgent warnings about a coming “false pope” and spiritual deception foretold in the Third Secret of Fatima. He recounts how John Paul II called all bishops to begin weekly Holy Hours to stop Satan’s grip on the clergy and ensure the secret’s contents were never fulfilled. According to confidant Robert Marro, Martin was made a cardinal in pectore during the Cold War and tasked with safeguarding the Church’s mission if the Vatican fell. Marro also claims Martin was tortured behind the Iron Curtain and later became a renowned exorcist and Vatican insider. Together, these accounts paint a picture of a spiritual warrior battling apostasy at the highest levels of the Church.
