Aream Suam logo AREAM SUAM

Fallback languages

Also show articles in these languages when not translated.

1 EN English

Preferences saved

Tag

Magna Quaestio

Magna Quaestio

The Letters 124 and 126 in Which St. Bernard of Clairvaux 'Photographed' the 2013 Coup d'État

Here is a concise summary (384 characters): Based on the letters of Saint Bernard defending the rights of Pope Innocent II against the antipope Anaclet (1130), Andrea Cionci draws a parallel with 2013: Benedict XVI not having renounced the Petrine 'munus,' his pontificate remained valid. The election of Francis was therefore canonically null. He was, like Anaclet, and as the antipope Leo is today, his successor, a usurper, for there can be only one pope at a time.

Source : Codice Ratzinger
Magna Quaestio

Fact-Checking the "Pope Emeritus"

Benedict XVI's Brilliant Canonical Maneuver to Outwit the Anti-Church

More facts, just plain facts. Because the Catholic faith is built on facts – the Incarnation, the Resurrection, the Ascension – and if we pay attention to the facts, we will be able to hear what the Holy Spirit is saying to the churches (Rev 3:13).

Source : Nicholas Owen's substack
Magna Quaestio

Andrea Cionci publishes emails received from Card. Robert Sarah: "We hope his book Ratzinger Code will enlighten consciences"

The cardinal had already expressed himself in 2021 by blessing the journalist's work. It is time to enforce the rights of the last true pope: Benedict XVI

Andrea Cionci releases correspondence with Cardinal Robert Sarah regarding the investigation into Benedict XVI's resignation and the validity of the 2025 conclave.

Source : QuotidianoWeb
Magna Quaestio

Fatima Priests Gruner and Kramer: Benedict’s Resignation Invalid - Francis was NOT Pope

John-Henry Westen speaks with Paul Kramer about the controversy surrounding the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and whether it met the requirements of canon law. The discussion centers on the distinction between munus (office) and ministerium (ministry), and how that difference could affect the legitimacy of later papal claims. The conversation explores broader theological questions about papal authority, heresy, and continuity in Church leadership. Implications for the pontificates of Pope Francis and Pope Leo XIV are also examined, underscoring ongoing debates within Catholic circles over authority, clarity, and fidelity to tradition.

Source : Radical Fidelity Substack