The fifth Commandment reads: Thou shalt not kill. Jorge Mario Bergoglio pretended to believe it and with extreme decisiveness condemned abortion: “because the defence of the dignity of human life from the first moment of conception until natural death has always found in the teaching of the Church its consistent and authoritative voice.…the Church has a clear doctrine!… It is a human life, period. And this human life must be respected… is it right to hire a hitman to solve a problem?”.
As Satan disguises himself as an angel of light (2Cor 11,14), in reality the Argentinian stumbled upon his own iniquity (Os 14,2) revealing a murderous inclination: he reproached the bishop of San Francisco, Cordileone, for denying communion to the unrepentant serial abortionist Nancy Pelosi; he told Joe Biden he could receive communion, even though the American President financed organisations like Planned Parenthood with millions of dollars, devoted to the abortion industry and to changing the sex of children; he praised, and even visited, the Italian influencer icon of abortion, Emma Bonino.
Leo XIV continues with dedication the destructive work of his beloved predecessor, carefully choosing pro-LGBT bishops, and therefore favourable to abortion; among the latest appointments are Christian Würtz (Freiburg), Heiner Wilmer (Münster), and Mario Antonio da Silva (Aparecida). The bishop of Ventimiglia-San Remo, Antonio Suetta, has decided to ring the ‘bell for life’, which every day at 8 pm, from the episcopal seat, reminds people of the children aborted. This initiative has been contested not only by left-wing politicians, as one might expect, but also by bishop Vincenzo Paglia. The media has given ample coverage to the affair, yet Suetta has been left alone by bishops and cardinals; even Leo was too busy talking about synodal peace and brotherhood to utter a word on this subject. Prevost refused to receive monsignor Viganò and Father Davide Pagliarani, yet warmly welcomed the leader of Christian LGBT, Father James Martin, who cheerfully participates in late-night talk shows to propagate his libertine ideology, and Sister Caram (who describes herself as ‘Bergoglio’s orphan’), who does not believe in the virginity of Mary and is an advocate of free abortion. Nor should we mention the praises and blessings reserved by the American for the pro-abortion-LGBT schismatic Anglican archbishop Sarah Mullally.
To defend the abortionist cardinal Blase Cupich, in September Leo repeated a hallucinatory phrase he had already pronounced on 14 October 2023: ‘Whoever says they are against abortion but agrees with the inhumane treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don’t know if they are pro-life.’ Naturally, he skimmed over the reports of lawyer Liz Yore, who accused the bishops of the United States — and therefore Prevost — of being complicit in the disappearance of half a million children imported from abroad on behalf of paedophiles and Satanists. ‘Pope Francis’ sponsored human trafficking and therefore the rape that women suffer during their journey, with a fine monument to migrants in Saint Peter’s Square. Leo XIV is no different, who, idolising his predecessor in every possible way, has named Favaloro Pier in Lampedusa after ‘Pope Francis’, having himself portrayed in front of the Porta d’Europa, a monument honouring the memory of migrants lost at sea. Is it perhaps possible to compare the number of migrants who die during their journey with the millions of children who are voluntarily aborted each year? If Prevost were an honest person, he should remove the monument to migrants in Saint Peter’s Square, and replace it with an artistic work in memory of children killed before birth; indeed, the bells of Saint Peter should ring every day in unison with those of Sanremo. Leo XIV sends messages for every occasion, yet seems little interested in those who commemorate the extermination of children. In the message sent to participants in the 2026 March for Life, there is a laconic reference from Prevost ‘in favour of unborn children’. On the occasion of the Day for Life on 13 June, Andrea Bocelli sent a message recalling that doctors advised his mother to abort, yet she chose life. The tenor commented: I owe everything to that choice.
When he was president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, speaking at a congress held in Rome on 2 November 2021, bishop Paglia stated that the ill person “has the decisive word regarding what concerns their own health and medical interventions on their body.” On the same occasion, he repeatedly affirmed that “life is mine”, but this is false, because life is entrusted to us, yet belongs to the Almighty. Setting aside other expressions from a declared atheist, speaking at the 2023 journalism festival in Perugia, after reaffirming Bergoglio’s dogma of ‘accompaniment’, the same bishop stated: “In this context, it cannot be ruled out that in our society a legal mediation may be feasible that permits assisted suicide in the conditions specified by Sentence 242/2019 of the Constitutional Court.” Through his faithful partisans, Bergoglio paved the way for suicide motivated by any type of mental whim.
Cardinal Cupich of the archdiocese of Chicago clarified the orientations of the synodal-rainbow church, inaugurating a monument to “honour the lives lost to suicide and provide a sacred space for prayer and remembrance.” Cupich said: “The Church now welcomes these people and affirms that they are with God, not condemned.” It is clear that it is not up to us to judge what can be generated by the psyche of a desperate person; in any case, what the cardinal says is false, because regarding the fifth Commandment, in the Catechism signed by John Paul II, we read:
2277 Whatever the motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. Whatever the motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable... An action or an omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be condemned and excluded.
Despite Jesus’ unequivocal judgement on Judas — «The Son of Man goes as it is written of him; but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would be better for that man if he had never been born!» (Mt 26,24-25) — Judas, the traitor, said: “Rabbi, is it I?”. He replied: “You have said it” (Mt 26,25) — rooted in his religious imposture, Bergoglio twisted the Gospel and saw Judas festively in paradise. Now we ask ourselves this question: is it possible that Judas experienced assisted suicide? The answer is definitely yes, because regarding the traitor, in the Gospel of John we read: «Jesus answered, “It is he to whom I will give this morsel when I have dipped it.” So when he had dipped the morsel, he gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. Then after he had taken the morsel, Satan entered into him» (Jn 13,26-27). With all the hatred that characterises him, Satan was the ‘special assistant’ of Judas’ suicide. Those who have experience of the Devil know full well that the same mechanism is repeated in many people who decide to take their own life.
On 11 March and 9 April, the former magistrate and politician Angelo Giorgianni wrote to the Cardinal Secretary of State of the Holy See Parolin, asking for clarification on three reasons that would have invalidated the 2025 conclave. Naturally, the synodal church of ‘listening’ and ‘dialogue’, when cornered, has neither the intention nor the desire to listen or to dialogue. Among Catholic intellectuals and traditionalists there is a great vogue for criticising Leo XIV whilst simultaneously considering him the ‘Holy Father’, but this is the greatest deception of these times. To these people, who delight in complaining, I would remind them that with the Abu Dhabi document signed by Bergoglio and already cited with veneration by Prevost, all religions would be inspired by a god not clearly identified, thereby rendering the first Commandment in effect null and void. After a few months, the Argentinian confirmed his apostasy with a solemn procession in Saint Peter’s in honour of the idol Pachamama, to which human sacrifices are still offered, especially by gold prospectors in the Peruvian Andes. I also recall a phrase from Bergoglio regarding what ‘once’ the Catholic Church condemned with the term concubinage: “Yet I truly say that I have seen so much faithfulness in these unions, so much faithfulness; and I am sure that this is a true marriage, they have the grace of marriage, precisely because of the faithfulness they have shown.” These expressions were a form of advertising to legitimise Amoris laetitia, with which Bergoglio permitted communion for all couples living together regardless of conditions, thereby authoritatively abolishing the sixth Commandment.
For the new church led by Prevost, the Ten Commandments now belong to a religious heritage that creates only embarrassment, because they obstruct the exuberant doctrinal lightness dictated by the ‘synodal path’, which for Leo XIV constitutes the new Creed. All the attention of the synodal-rainbow church is focused on universal brotherhood which implies the recognition of the One Religion, the frail health of Mother Earth, and the welcome of migrants, all themes that will constitute the battle horse of the Antichrist. Before the evidence of the facts, is the schismatic Fraternity of Saint Pius X recently excommunicated, or is it much more the false church of Rome announced in so many prophecies? We are already immersed in apostasy, yet soon we will witness its complete triumph. Leo XIV will reign for only a few years, yet he will reserve us great novelties!
Antonio Romano